Partial facial paralysis induced by sialolithiasis of the parotid gland: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Facial paralysis due to parotid sialolithiasis-induced parotitis is a unusual clinical phenomenon that has not been reported in prior literature. This scenario can present a diagnostic challenge due to its rarity and complex symptomatology, particularly if a patient has other potential contributing factors such as facial trauma or bilateral forehead botox injections as in this patient. This case report elucidates such a complex presentation, aiming to increase awareness and promote timely recognition among clinicians. CASE PRESENTATION: A 56-year-old male, with a medical history significant for hyperlipidemia, recurrent parotitis secondary to parotid sialolithiasis, and recent bilateral forehead cosmetic Botox injections presented to the emergency department with right lower facial drooping. This onset was about an hour after waking up and was of 4 h duration. The patient also had a history of a recent ground level fall four days prior that resulted in facial trauma to his right eyebrow without any evident neurological deficits in the region of the injury. A thorough neurological exam revealed sensory and motor deficits across the entirety of the right face, indicating a potential lesion affecting the buccal and marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerve (CN VII). Several differential diagnoses were considered for the lower motor neuron lesion, including soft tissue trauma or swelling from the recent fall, compression due to the known parotid stone, stroke, and complex migraines. An MRI of the brain was conducted to rule out a stroke, with no significant findings. A subsequent CT scan of the neck revealed an obstructed and dilated right Stensen's duct with a noticeably larger and anteriorly displaced sialolith and evidence of parotid gland inflammation. A final diagnosis of facial palsy due to parotitis secondary to sialolithiasis was made. The patient was discharged and later scheduled for a procedure to remove the sialolith which resolved his facial paralysis. CONCLUSIONS: This case emphasizes the need for a comprehensive approach to the differential diagnosis in presentations of facial palsy. It underscores the potential involvement of parotid sialolithiasis, particularly in patients with a history of recurrent parotitis or facial trauma. Prompt recognition of such uncommon presentations can prevent undue interventions, aid in timely appropriate management, and significantly contribute to the patient's recovery and prevention of long-term complications.

Institutional review of the management of type II odontoid fractures: associations and outcomes with fibrous union.

OBJECTIVE: Type II odontoid fractures may be managed operatively or nonoperatively. If managed with bracing, bony union may never occur despite stability. This phenomenon is termed fibrous union. The authors aimed to determine associations with stable fibrous union and compare the morbidity of patients managed operatively and nonoperatively. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective review of their spine trauma database for adults with type II odontoid fractures between 2015 and 2019. Two-sample t-tests and Fisher's exact tests identified associations with follow-up stability and were used to compare operative and nonoperative outcomes. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated to validate initial stable upright cervical radiographs related to follow-up stability. RESULTS: Among 88 patients, 10% received upfront surgical fixation, and 90% were managed nonoperatively, of whom 22% had fracture instability on follow-up. Associations with instability after nonoperative management include myelopathy (OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.0-0.92), cerebrovascular disease (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.06-1.0), and dens displacement ≥ 2 mm (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.07-1.0). Advanced age was not associated with follow-up instability. Initial stability on upright radiographs was associated with stability on follow-up (OR 4.29, 95% CI 1.0-18) with excellent sensitivity and positive predictive value (sensitivity 89%, specificity 35%, positive predictive value 83%, and negative predictive value 46%). The overall complication rate and respiratory failure requiring ventilation on individual complication analysis were more common in operatively managed patients (33% vs 3%, respectively; p = 0.007), even though they were generally younger and healthier than those managed nonoperatively. Operative or nonoperative management conferred no difference in length of hospital or ICU stay, discharge disposition, or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The authors delineate the validity of upright cervical radiographs on presentation in association with follow-up stability in type II odontoid fractures. In their experience, factors associated with instability included cervical myelopathy, cerebrovascular disease, and fracture displacement but not increased age. Operatively managed patients had higher complication rates than those managed without surgery. Fibrous union, which can occur with nonoperative management, provided adequate stability.